<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364</id><updated>2011-04-21T21:13:38.269-06:00</updated><title type='text'>3L or Bust</title><subtitle type='html'>"Chocolate Cake for Breakfast? That's Nutrition!"</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>34</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-109362756733409643</id><published>2004-08-27T11:26:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-08-27T11:26:07.333-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Premature Labor No Excuse for Missed Court Deadlinefrom the article:"As the deadline approached, Cote's small law practice was beset with unforeseen distractions. First, he was notified that an adoption application he and his wife submitted had been accepted and that he needed to go to China promptly to adopt the child. He left in September and stayed until late November. Also that fall, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109362756733409643'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109362756733409643'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_08_22_archive.html#109362756733409643' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-109362738812186273</id><published>2004-08-27T11:23:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-08-27T11:23:08.120-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>hey, no shortcuts in doing your assignment, not even for Judges</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109362738812186273'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109362738812186273'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_08_22_archive.html#109362738812186273' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-109284557119619957</id><published>2004-08-18T10:12:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-08-18T10:12:51.196-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>to paraphrase Tom Hanks:There's no crying on the jury!</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109284557119619957'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109284557119619957'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_08_15_archive.html#109284557119619957' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-109232964462236604</id><published>2004-08-12T10:54:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-08-12T10:54:04.623-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>you would think that in this age where digitalization and electronic-everything supposedly streamlines our lives and improves the way we do things, that something called "e-discovery" would be a boone to lawfirms in terms of saving economic resources ... but apparently not ...From The Surging Evolution of E-Discovery"Electronic discovery -- or e-discovery -- has become much more complicated </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109232964462236604'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109232964462236604'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_08_08_archive.html#109232964462236604' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-109122157587499106</id><published>2004-07-30T15:06:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-07-30T15:06:15.873-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>as a follow-up to the article about blogging lawsuits, see GROKLAW, which is a blog covering the SCO v. IBM lawsuit over open source rights to UNIX in excruciating detail</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109122157587499106'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109122157587499106'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_07_25_archive.html#109122157587499106' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-109111513991115487</id><published>2004-07-29T09:32:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-07-29T09:32:19.910-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>came across this article today:Blogs Dot the Litigation Landscapeseems like blogs are branching out and making themselves useful ...one of the case blogs referred to is run by a lawyer named Reback for PeopleSoft, the target of a hostile takeover by Oracle; "At his client's request, Reback is 'blogging' the proceeding, sitting in the trial all day, taking notes, and filing an account on </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109111513991115487'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/109111513991115487'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_07_25_archive.html#109111513991115487' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-108785074361436111</id><published>2004-06-21T14:45:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-06-21T14:45:43.613-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Man, don't mess with the Forest Servicecrazy.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/108785074361436111'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/108785074361436111'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_06_20_archive.html#108785074361436111' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-108731411322873784</id><published>2004-06-15T09:33:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2004-06-15T09:41:53.230-06:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Summertime ... and the living is easy ... now that school is outThe semester finished off with a bang - got all my final exams out of the way, finished writing my opinion (Locke v. Davey - I was in the minority in class but in reality the majority went with me) for the Supreme Court seminar, and then spent the next week writing a paper for my ERISA class (almost literally starting from scratch)</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/108731411322873784'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/108731411322873784'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_06_13_archive.html#108731411322873784' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107785244676134626</id><published>2004-02-26T20:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-02-26T20:30:17.873-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>I'm taking a great class this semester - a Supreme Court Seminar ...A major portion of the class consists of our making oral arguments (shades of 1L Moot Court competition) before the class (acting as the Judges on the Supreme Court) in current cases that are on the Court's docket.My buddy and I went against each other the other day - was fun.  The case that we argued was U.S. v. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107785244676134626'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107785244676134626'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_02_22_archive.html#107785244676134626' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107757952955606392</id><published>2004-02-23T16:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-02-23T16:41:36.186-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>oh, and in the FYI department, I made the board of law review ...if you're wondering what that means, don't worry about it (all it really means is that I'll be incredibly busy for the next year)if you know what that means, I accept your condolences</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107757952955606392'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107757952955606392'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_02_22_archive.html#107757952955606392' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107757939117436559</id><published>2004-02-23T16:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-02-23T16:40:32.763-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>not sure how I feel about this, butI AM RULE 11!You were designed to make sure that attorneys infederal cases make reasonable inquiries intofact or law before submitting pleadings,motions, or other papers.  You were a realhardass in 1983, when you snuffed out all legalcreativity from federal proceedings andembarassed well-meaning but overzealousattorneys.  You loosened up a bit in 1993, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107757939117436559'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107757939117436559'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_02_22_archive.html#107757939117436559' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107620280058233041</id><published>2004-02-07T18:13:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-02-07T18:15:45.623-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Mazzone begins molding new staff"This kind of situation never would have happened eight or 10 years ago [when Ted Turner owned the Braves]," Jones said. "But John [Schuerholz, general manager] is operating under a different set of circumstances. He did the best he could."Jones spoke with Schuerholz several times during the offseason, discussing players the Braves were targeting and the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107620280058233041'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107620280058233041'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_02_01_archive.html#107620280058233041' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107583789947903296</id><published>2004-02-03T12:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-02-03T12:54:23.250-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>okay, states that I have visited ... </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107583789947903296'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107583789947903296'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_02_01_archive.html#107583789947903296' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107549480485135254</id><published>2004-01-30T13:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-01-30T13:35:38.326-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>I took an Intellectual Property class last semester, so this article caught my attention ...apparently the "State of Wyoming" has been using the cowboy-riding-the-bucking-bronco image "forever" ... BUT ... they never bothered to register as a trademark with the feds; so when The Texas Stampede (annual rodeo in Dallas benefitting children's medical charities) filed for registration of the exact </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107549480485135254'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107549480485135254'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_01_25_archive.html#107549480485135254' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107543630349054958</id><published>2004-01-29T21:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-01-29T21:20:36.233-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>math is not my strong suit, but this is pretty funny ...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107543630349054958'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107543630349054958'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_01_25_archive.html#107543630349054958' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107532810585486178</id><published>2004-01-28T15:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-01-28T15:17:16.983-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Aaron Gleeman has a interesting post comparing Eckersley and Smoltz in regards to Smoltz's possible place in the Hall of Fame ... all in all a good post, although I take issue with a few of his comparison techniques, but let's leave that for another time</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107532810585486178'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107532810585486178'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_01_25_archive.html#107532810585486178' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107474449291083448</id><published>2004-01-21T21:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-01-21T21:10:14.780-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>normally I don't follow politics all too closely, but this is wild - and people want this guy as our next President? woah ... listen to the meltdown here</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107474449291083448'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107474449291083448'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_01_18_archive.html#107474449291083448' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107462577323447199</id><published>2004-01-20T12:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-01-20T12:17:34.216-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>this is awesome: CNN.com - Teen fights to keep MikeRoweSoft.com - Jan. 20, 2004although, is anyone else disturbed by the block quote on the side? "I really think it's a lawyer thing with them trying to get more money." ... ? right, lawyers are the only profession out to get more money.  Why don't we ever hear the phrase "it must be an Doctor thing, charging way too much" ?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107462577323447199'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107462577323447199'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2004_01_18_archive.html#107462577323447199' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107203132327142240</id><published>2003-12-21T11:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-12-21T11:31:18.020-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>I realize it's been awhile since my last post.needless to say, things have been a little busy and stressful lately.  This semester was pretty busy, and finals were pretty time-consuming and stressful.  I only had three finals total, but I had two right in a row thet last week of finals, which was not fun.  People ask me how they went and the standard answer is this: I probably did a little </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107203132327142240'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107203132327142240'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_12_21_archive.html#107203132327142240' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107121125704340628</id><published>2003-12-11T23:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-12-11T23:41:09.410-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>now this (Kory Stringer's survivors ordered to pay Vikings) is just sad ... sounds like the grieving family is also the grieving greedy family; memo to the Stringer's, when the judge throws out most of your claims and orders you to pay attorney's fees, and the other side volunteers to waive the imposition of the attorney's fees, you should probably take it ...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107121125704340628'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107121125704340628'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107121125704340628' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107042985108848532</id><published>2003-12-02T22:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-12-02T22:37:41.210-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>strangeis it just me, or does anyone else find it odd that in Tax parlance a Gain is a bad thing and Loss is a good thingso screwy ...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107042985108848532'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107042985108848532'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107042985108848532' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-107038525323558692</id><published>2003-12-02T10:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-12-02T10:15:25.950-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>hammer timeone week to go, seven days ... till my Fed Tax final.  (dread)you know how the morning of a final you get this resigned feeling like there's no point in studying anymore because it wouldn't do much good at this point anyway? you know that feeling? is it a bad thing that I'm starting to get that feeling already? does your answer change if I tell you that I've only read through the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107038525323558692'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/107038525323558692'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107038525323558692' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106978944118257806</id><published>2003-11-25T12:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-25T12:44:30.483-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>revealing my (past) ignorancebefore business school and law school, I would have read the following sentences and really not understood what they were talking about: "The critical issue is, does the IRS consider these [home improvement] projects improvements or repairs? If they are improvements, I can include them in the cost basis of the house, and thus reduce my capital gain if I ever move to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106978944118257806'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106978944118257806'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106978944118257806' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106978923552258313</id><published>2003-11-25T12:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-25T12:40:43.626-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Can I get a ruling on this?so I was driving home last night listening to sports radio, and some east coast caller was talking about Joey Harrington and how good he was in college at Oregon, only he was pronouncing it "Or-eh-GONE" . . . okay, that bugs me.  The only people I've ever heard refer to it that way are people that have obviously never been there.  People, it's "ORE-eh-gun".  please say</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106978923552258313'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106978923552258313'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106978923552258313' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106971253844034684</id><published>2003-11-24T15:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-24T15:22:26.546-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>oh manyou've got to love squib note cases like the following:In Estate of Neiderhiser, 2 Pa. D. &amp; C.3d 202, 59 Westmoreland County L.J. 60 (1977), the groom dropped dead during the marriage ceremony, after he and the bride had each said "I will" (equal in other marriage ceremonies to "I do"). The court held that marriage is a contract which becomes binding upon the exchange of vows, and the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106971253844034684'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106971253844034684'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106971253844034684' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106970610295182170</id><published>2003-11-24T13:35:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-24T13:35:24.896-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Rush . . . (not the band)So I'm sitting at the firm Friday morning, and one of the partners shows up about an hour before I was going to leave ands says the following: "I have a final pretrial conference on Monday and we just got these motions in limine and we need a quick response to them, can you respond to the first one by Monday morning?"(grrrrrr)Me: "of course! I'll get right on it, I'd </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106970610295182170'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106970610295182170'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106970610295182170' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106945466312207308</id><published>2003-11-21T15:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T15:44:30.130-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Wolverine does Rogers and Hammerstein</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106945466312207308'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106945466312207308'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106945466312207308' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106944501467373399</id><published>2003-11-21T13:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T13:03:42.206-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>blahsitting in tax, snowing outside, Friday afternoon ... how much do I really want to be here?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106944501467373399'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106944501467373399'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106944501467373399' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106944031239458610</id><published>2003-11-21T11:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T11:45:19.330-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>funny quote about blogging from some scotish writer: Lord help us, there are even blawgs, lawyers bolgs, or - to use a more appropriate term - achingly dull wastes of cyberspacehee hee</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106944031239458610'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106944031239458610'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106944031239458610' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106943054310731080</id><published>2003-11-21T09:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T09:07:56.293-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Sometimes Life SucksIf you can spare a minute, browse your way over to Paco's site and lend some support.  Dude's getting a massively bum rap.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106943054310731080'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106943054310731080'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106943054310731080' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106943047450607411</id><published>2003-11-21T09:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T09:12:16.553-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>possible career path rearing its ugly head?about half of the projects that I worked on for the judge involved ERISA of all things.  Now, prior to working for the Judge I knew absolutely nothing about ERISA ... well, that's not true, I had heard the word "ERISA" a couple of times thrown around by law professors or by students ahead of me, but I never had a context for understanding what exactly </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106943047450607411'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106943047450607411'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106943047450607411' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106934804579034128</id><published>2003-11-20T10:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-20T13:42:20.860-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Mixed FeelingsYesterday was my last day externing for the Federal District Court judge.(I don't know why my school calls it an externship, I suppose it is to distinguish it from a paid internship or an unpaid internship w/o school credit ... maybe it's some inane desire to be "different", I don't know, I've long since given up trying to fathom the thought processes of our CSO)I'm going to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106934804579034128'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106934804579034128'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106934804579034128' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106917977546995607</id><published>2003-11-18T11:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-20T10:13:00.053-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>The Day of the Massachusetts Decisionor: this case will be talked about for a long time8:21working on:Antitrust cases of the professorit's crunch time because he wants all of the cases briefed by Thanksgiving, so I'm spending a lot of time this next week working on them . . . I am getting paid for it, so (to quote Bill Murray in Caddyshack) "at least I've got that going for me"The chapter</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106917977546995607'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106917977546995607'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106917977546995607' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6093364.post-106911511231325615</id><published>2003-11-17T17:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-11-17T17:27:09.286-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>At the Carrel, Buckling Down2:05pmWorking on at the moment:catching up on Tax reading that I should have done over the weekendSubject - Loss of Human CapitalAllocating Deductions Between Income Production and Personal Consumption - Moss v. Commissioner . . . apparently the rule from this case is that if you choose to eat with your co-workers at a restaurant that you enjoy eating at, then (</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106911511231325615'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6093364/posts/default/106911511231325615'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://lawschool-2l.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106911511231325615' title=''/><author><name>mbt</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06750414249073790673</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
